Nina Allan's Homepage

Category: writers (Page 21 of 21)

OMG 10K!

I’ve just been watching Mo Farah’s beautiful, beautiful win in the Olympic men’s 10,000 metres. What a race. I could hardly bear to watch those two final laps. I didn’t see how he could possibly hang on to it. Totally awesome.

And in spite of all Olypmic distractions (of which there have been many) I have been working well on the book this week. I’m almost at the end of the second draft of Part One. Things feel like they’re sliding into place – finally, suddenly – and I begin to catch glimpses of what I’ve been struggling to catch hold of this whole past year.

Listening to: Gillian Welch (again).

Currently reading: Doris Lessing, The Memoirs of a Survivor. What an unnervingly strange book that is. I haven’t read Lessing for some years, but it’s hugely instructive to be doing so at the moment. I like the way her thought processes seem to formulate themselves even as she writes. I admire her total disregard for the conventions surrounding how a good novel should behave and be constructed. Lessing’s work seems almost to construct itself as it goes along. It becomes what it needs to be. I would aspire to such courage. Also, it’s fascinating to note how central SF and SFnal ideas have been to Lessing’s career. She’s not afraid to own this, either.

I like.

Empty Space

M. John Harrison’s novel Empty Space, the final instalment in the Kefahuchi Tract trilogy, is published today.

The first thing I ever read by MJH was his story ‘The Ice Monkey’. I came upon the story completely by chance, in a second hand copy of an anthology called New Terrors 2. It was just a scrappy little Pan paperback, but I bought it the moment I saw it, firstly because it was edited by Ramsey Campbell and secondly because it contained a story by Christopher Priest (‘The Miraculous Cairn’) that I hadn’t read yet.

It’s interesting to look back at older anthologies (New Terrors 2 was first published in 1980) because they present a fascinating portrait of who has survived. NT2 contains stories by US horror stalwarts Robert Bloch and Charles L. Grant, both sadly no longer with us, both now members of horror’s hall of fame. There are a number of other stories by writers who were clearly promising at the time but who have since, for whatever reason, stopped publishing.

But of course it’s Priest and Harrison that stand out most strongly from this table of contents. Both young, both British, in 1980 both just getting into their stride, quite obviously these were the two to watch.I wonder what stories the anthologies of today will tell us in thirty years’ time?

‘The Ice Monkey’ bothered me. It bothered me because I’d never read anything like it before and I wasn’t quite sure what I was supposed to make of it. Here it was in a horror anthology, but although I found it acutely disturbing there was no way it could be placed in the same bracket as, say, the Charles L. Grant. Was it SF? Again, I wasn’t sure. It kind of reminded me of Ballard’s The Drought, another masterpiece I’d recently discovered, but it didn’t have anything so overtly SFnal as a world apocalypse going on in it.

I didn’t know what it was, but I knew it compelled and drew me and nagged at me. I knew I loved the writing, the imagery, that godawful abandoned house in the middle of an industrial wasteland. I knew that this, whatever the hell genre it was supposed to be, was the kind of story I wanted to be reading and learning about and I couldn’t keep away from it. I must have read that story three or four times right through before I could leave it alone. Subsequent to that I was thrilled to discover Signs of Life and, a little later, The Course of the Heart. I acquired MJH’s new collection Travel Arrangements as soon as it came out. I was sold.

When Light, the first book in what has come to be known as the Kefahuchi Tract trilogy, was first published in 2002 I bought it eagerly but found myself a little bemused. The Brian Kearney strand – prizewinning physicist becomes serial killer in order to fend off existential monster – was precisely the kind of stuff I’d come to expect from MJH, home turf, if you like. But the interwoven stories of Ed Chianese and Seria Mau Genlicher? What was I, so at home in the disintegrating worlds of Choe Ashton and Isobel Avens, to make of these far future montages, which seemed to me inextricably enmeshed in quantum ironies, so multilayered I could scarcely untangle them. They were also such…… fun. Fun makes me nervous. What was I supposed to do with it?

I wasn’t sure, so I kind of left my thoughts about the book in limbo. Nova Swing, when it appeared in 2006, I found easier to penetrate. It seemed to be a loving and awesomely creative riff on Arkady and Boris Strugatsky’s Roadside Picnic, a touchstone book for me since forever, and this presented me with a ‘way of reading’ the Light books that began to give me a clearer insight into what MJH was doing – with SF, with the trilogy, with his writing. On completing Nova Swing I read Light again and this time I got it immediately.  I laughed, I cried (this is literally true) and it was a revelation. When I recently reread Light for a third time, as a preparation and a lead-in to reading the final act of the trilogy in Empty Space, I found it so good it was frightening, the kind of book that, as a writer, makes you sit down and bury your head in your arms and keep saying ‘shit.’

It’s hard to talk about Empty Space without referring back to the other two books, because of course you’ll find characters reappearing, story threads unravelling or, occasionally, tying themselves up, moods and places and events recurring in droves. But you’ll also find that Empty Space is a rather different kind of book from either of its two predecessors, which are both in turn rather different from one another. If Light was the definitive grand opera of space opera, the exact point where SF stops being SF and becomes proper metaphysics, and Nova Swing was an intrepidly successful experiment in time travel, both backwards and forwards,  then Empty Space is a meditation, both a resolution and deconstruction of its own (totally awesome) internal narrative. If Light segued effortlessly into metaphysics, then Empty Space segues effortlessly into poetry. MJH has repeatedly cited T. S. Eliot as an early influence, and if Nova Swing takes you deeper into the Zone, Empty Space revisits ‘The Waste Land’, only not then, and more so.

You can read Empty Space – or either of the other two – perfectly well on its own. Its internal logic and poetry makes it complete and completely satisfying unto itself. But read one, and trust me you will demand to read the others!

In his recent interview with Simon Ings at ARCfinity, MJH talks about there being ‘no contradiction’ in his mind between the Light books ‘giving good value’ as space opera whilst at the same time making the whole concept of space opera rock in its foundations. To say that all three books – both singly and together – succeed, absolutely, on both levels is kind of a cataclysmic understatement. I loved the story of Empty Space, as story I was barely able to put it down. But Empty Space is so much more than just story. At a sentence level, as writing, Empty Space is like an infinite jewel casket. As a novel, it makes you pull up short and reappraise everything you’ve ever read or tried to write. As a statement on where we are now, where we are headed and what the fuck we think we’re going to be doing when we get there, Empty Space is a nostalgic reverie, a philosophical treatise, a thrown gauntlet.

Buy it and read it and start discussing it asap.

The witching hour

After loving Mr Fox (and previous to that The Icarus Girl) I’ve been using my reading time this week to catch up with Helen Oyeyemi’s third novel, White is for Witching. I remember the reviews at the time being mixed, which is most likely why it’s taken me so long to get round to reading it.

Turns out I was a total idiot. Taking too much notice of reviews like this, a distinctly sour-faced write-up which seems to ignore the point of the book so entirely as to make it meaningless, always carries with it the risk that you’ll end up missing out on something truly worthwhile, the kind of book that divides the critics, because it’s unclassifiable, because it’s elusive, because it’s difficult.

Trust the writer, not the reviewer, I say.

And White is for Witching is not difficult, for God’s sake. It’s complicated, yes – and deeply complex. It jumps back and forth in time and between narrators. Its language alternates between a lively and illustrative contemporary vernacular and the high poetry of witchcraft, densely allusive. Its stories are nested one within the other, back touching stomach, spooned together as its two principal characters, Miranda and Ore, lie spooned together, their knees hooked at dangerous right angles, like the legs of spiders. Times, cultures, terrors, manias, all intertwined like lovers, like interlocking pieces of some beautifully constructed and arcane jigsaw puzzle.

But all this does is to make the book sublime, not difficult, and certainly not ‘difficult’ or, even worse, ‘confused.’

Helen Oyeyemi is so for real. She’s a writer bursting with natural talent – her prose has that instinctive assurance, that quality of wildfire, that is a sure sign that she was born to do this – yet she is also a writer acutely aware of what she is doing. Her literary sensibility, her understanding of the texts that inspired her (Dracula, Uncle Silas, The Fall of the House of Usher) makes White is for Witching possibly the most elegant and knowing homage to the high Gothic that I have ever read, whilst at the same time extending the reach of this novel far beyond that, to encompass contemporary concerns in a direct and bold and strikingly original way.

White is for Witching is also bloody terrifying. In stark contrast with The Guardian‘s reviewer, I found the sense of mounting claustrophobia in the novel, especially in the scenes near the end where Ore is trying to make her escape from the house, to be as unsettling and actively upsetting as anything in Dracula and more so. This is now, after all, this is here. There’s an acute sense of realism in White is for Witching, of believability, that still has me absolutely spellbound.

This book is brilliant, in every sense. Read it. And do listen to Helen Oyeyemi talking about White is for Witching here.

After finishing the first draft of the novel last week I am now leaving it to simmer while I catch up on a couple of other smaller but not unimportant bits and pieces. I’ve been finishing my author profile for PS, to accompany the release of Stardust, and now I’m completely absorbed in writing the piece that will complete my collection for NewCon, to be published in 2013 as part of the Imaginings series of short story collections. The story is called ‘Higher Up’ and I’m within touching distance of finishing a first draft. It’s rather different from the story I thought it was going to be but – well, I’m kind of liking that.

A beautiful achievement

I’m delighted to hear that Sarah Hall has been named the winner of this year’s Edge Hill Prize for the best short story collection to be published in 2011. Her collection The Beautiful Indifference also carried off the Readers’ Prize, awarded to the collection judged to be the best by Edge Hill students.

I read The Beautiful Indifference at the back end of last year and loved it completely. I tend to prefer collections that consist of fewer, longer stories rather than a random host of unconnected shorter ones, and Hall’s collection, with its seven fine stories, three of them at almost novella length, certainly delivered on that score. I felt particularly drawn to the sense of unease that runs through all these pieces – ‘She Murdered Mortal He’, which was selected for Granta’s ‘Horror Issue’ in October last year, was undoubtedly my favourite horror story of 2011, and the title story, ‘The Beautiful Indifference’, left me mute with admiration.

Although the stories are different from one another in terms of their subject matter and narrative voice, I never strayed far from the sense that they were nonetheless linked, through their tone, which is one of dread, of trouble in waiting, and then of course through their language, which is resplendent, richly coloured, accomplished in that way that feels effortless and yet is the mark of highest craftsmanship.

SF readers will already know Sarah Hall for The Carhullan Army, which was shortlisted for the Clarke in 2008. These stories are more proof that Hall does have a slipstream temperament. I sincerely hope she will want to explore this territory further in future works. In the meantime, I do recommend this wonderful collection one-hundred percent.

Congratulations to Sarah Hall. Brilliant result.

Very pleased also to see that novellas four and five in the aforementioned TTA novellas project have now been announced. I’m particulary glad to see that Country Dark, by James Cooper, will be part of the line-up.  James is a fantastic writer, and if you’ve not yet read his collection The Beautiful Red then you’re in for a treat. This is weird fiction of the highest quality, compelling and dark and weird and wonderfully crafted. For me, it has that quality of genuine and genuinely frightening strangeness I look forward to in my favourite Robert Aickman stories.

A new story by James Cooper is always something to savour – and to learn from.

In other news, I’m happy to report that I finished the first draft of the novel on Thursday. If I haven’t said anything before it’s because I’m still feeling slightly bemused.

More on this in due course!

Winchelsea

So she parked on a street adjacent to The Lookout (by the Old Strand Gate) where there was a famously stunning view over the marshes below (the Royal Military Canal, the long road into Rye, the remains of Camber Castle, Winchelsea Beach, Dungeness – the power station and the lighthouse, both twinkling vaguely in the Channel – even France, on a good day), and led him by the hand (although he insisted on leaving the boy behind – ‘as a precaution’) to take in the vista.

The wind was biting and it was threatening to rain again. Dory gazed down, in silence, for several minutes, yet no matter how hard he tried (and he was trying – the powerful wave of his reason crashing, indomitably, against the sheer cliff of his instinct), he seemed incapable of feeling any kind of rapport with the landscape.

‘But where’s the great forest, Elen?’ he finally murmured.

(Nicola Barker, Darkmans p439)

The extraordinary thing is that when I first read Nicola Barker’s magisterial novel Darkmans in 2007 I had not yet encountered this landscape, nor seen any of the places named in the paragraphs above. Now that I am getting to know them, to assimilate them as imagery as well as fact, I find that Barker’s novel – which I loved and admired from the first – resonates with me all the more deeply.

Darkmans is a piece of work. In an interview she gave around the time of its publication, Nicola Barker talked about how she went into a kind of suspended animation during the final months of writing it, cutting off the internet, wearing ear muffs to block out all exterior noise. I found myself understanding and applauding. Real writing takes everything, precludes all other mental activity, all outside stimuli.

It means forfeiting the quotidian world – at least for a while.

I’ve been thinking a lot about Darkmans today, about how much I admire it – those unruly, renegade sentences, that don’t-give-a-stuff disregard for competent orderliness (and ordinariness) that conceals such stern craftsmanship, most of all that vertiginous, daredevil way of commandeering the fantastic – and how much it still continues to inspire me.

The scope of its ambition – and it’s an ambition realised – is enough to prevent any writer from sleeping at night.

It’s one of those books I like to keep close by, like a lucky charm.

This road sign, whose history I haven’t investigated yet, can be seen just before the turnoff path to Winchelsea station.

I can’t help but feel there has to be a story here somewhere.

Climbing towards Winchelsea Beacon.

Tram Road, Rye Harbour.

Rustblind and Silverbright

David Rix of Eibonvale Press has just announced a call for submissions for a new anthology. The theme is trains and railways. The wonderful title is drawn from a story by Wolfgang Borchert.

I will always have a soft spot for Borchert. His stories ‘Das Brot’ and ‘Nachts Schlafen die Ratten Doch’ were the first pieces of German fiction I read in their original language – like Kafka, and like Chekhov in Russian, Borchert’s talent for expressing complex truths in a deceptively simple way makes him an ideal starting point for anyone trying to learn his language. I was moved by these stories, but it wasn’t until I tried translating his rather longer story ‘Billbrook’ that I began to fully understand the power of his writing and the extremity of his wartime experience.

Anyone coming to ‘Billbrook’ unannounced, as it were, might be forgiven for taking it to be a science fiction story set in the days following a nuclear holocaust. In fact it’s about the blanket bombing, in WW2, of Borchert’s home city, Hamburg.

Borchert loved his city, and he is brilliant at portraying the multitudinous multiplicity of the urban environment. He loved the magic and the mystery of the city as organism, and his grief at the utterly needless and wanton destruction of his home-place – its literal reduction to rubble – might be said to be at least as much the cause of his appallingly early death (aged 26) as the complications from hepatitis that are usually cited. Borchert, like so many Germans, was a victim of both the Nazis (he was arrested more than once by the Gestapo for his anti-Nazi views, imprisoned and then sent to the Eastern Front as punishment) and the Allies.

Borchert also loved railways. We know that from the way they shimmer and creak and thunder into his stories. When he likened the human soul to the railway track – ‘rusty, stained, silver, shiny, beautiful and uncertain’ – he was recognising the possibilities for change, for beauty and above all for exploration that railways provide in both the physical and spiritual realm, the way trains – somehow much more than cars and at least equally with space rockets – excite and stimulate and prompt the creative imagination.

I don’t think it’s too presumptious to argue that Borchert would have loved the idea of an anthology of SF railway stories. He might even have written one for Rustblind himself. Let us hope he would at least approve the use of his words in the choice of title.

I know that this project is very close indeed to David’s heart and has been long in the planning. He first mentioned it to me more than a year ago – while we were watching a ‘cab ride’ DVD shot from a train running the Tren a las Nubes line across Argentina. His train addiction is one I share. Indeed a love of trains is common to many writers, who value the opportunities they provide for the most productive kind of solitude, for the observation of people and places, for meditation and reflection, for extended reading time. Not to mention being a mobile workspace.

It’s going to be thrilling to see what stories people come up with.

You can – and please do – read the full submission guidelines for Rustblind and Silverbright right here.

‘At noon, or 3am’

I first read Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 at school, at the age of thirteen or fourteen, as part of my ‘O’ Level English Literature course. I was mesmerised by it – at that age dystopian SF was pretty much my literature of choice. I was in love with the rage it engendered in me, as well as the fear. I knew nothing about Ray Bradbury – he was just the bloke who wrote the book, the name on the cover. At around the same time I was similarly gripped by the BBC miniseries of The Martian Chronicles. I can’t remember if I connected the two experiences, if the name ‘Ray Bradbury’ clicked with me at that point. What I do know is that I loved those stories.

I find it difficult to read Bradbury these days. I dip in from time to time – those early stories in The October Country still mean a lot to me – but there’s an overexcitability to a lot of his prose, an overwritten quality that, for me at least, makes it seem dated. And yet.

I’ve been writing since I was six years old, but when I first started to take my writing seriously – when I decided that this was what I wanted to do, what I should, in fact, be doing – it was to other writers I instinctively turned. I was hungry for their advice. I read more ‘how to’ books than could ever have been good for me. Not all of them were good – or perhaps I should say not all of them felt relevant to me. But all of them had something, if I was prepared to wrest it free, and one of them had an essay by Ray Bradbury.

I’ve never forgotten it. He described with candour and good humour how he found and pursued his vocation. I was greatly taken by the method he had, of writing down endless lists of nouns – The Dwarf, The Baby, The Basement, The Mirror Maze, The Carnival – and then trusting that a story would come along to fit each such title. We know now that mostly it did. I even followed his method myself, for a while. I still love his essay, the honesty of it, and the passion. I’m still affected by the quality of his imagination: unquiet, baroque, almost rapacious in its intensity. The joy he felt in creation is obvious, and deeply honourable. Above all else, the man loved words, and cherished all the places a story could take him.

We lost someone important today.

I’m happy to say that even if I can’t remember when precisely I realised that Fahrenheit 451 and The Martian Chronicles were written by the same person, I can remember, exactly, when I first became aware of Bradbury the writer, and his stature in the world of weird fiction. I remember because he bloody scared the shit out of me. In the mid-eighties there was a series of half-hour dramatisations of Bradbury stories broadcast late at night on Radio 4. I would lie in bed, reading with the radio on, waiting for the moment when Bradbury’s voice would come over the airwaves to introduce the next story. At that point I would lay down my book and switch out the light, and listen with rising horror as the tale unfolded.

It was something about being in the dark, with the radio on, just me and the story and nothing in between. I have to confess that there were several times when I found myself having to switch off the radio before the story ended. But nothing would stop me tuning in again for more the following week.

The worst – and best – was ‘Night Call, Collect’. I have no idea why this story, of a lone accidental survivor of a nuclear holocaust, trapped on Mars with nothing but his own recorded voice for company, terrified me quite so much, but I remember that by the end of the broadcast my whole body was rigid with tension and my palms were sweating.

Ray Bradbury did his job, and he did it good.

Reading some of the early tributes, I came across this quote, picked out by his grandson, Danny Karapetian, as his favourite:

“My tunes and numbers are here. They have filled my years, the years when I refused to die. And in order to do that I wrote, I wrote, I wrote, at noon or 3am.

“So as not to be dead.'”

He will never leave us.

(You can listen to the recording of ‘Night Call, Collect’ here.)

In the South

It’s odd, the way major royal events always seem to coincide with me being out of the country. I was in France for the Silver Jubilee – my parents had to get special permission for me to be absent from school and no one, I repeat no one from my class thought to save me a commemorative mug and coin – and I spent most of Charles and Diana’s wedding day in a park in Zell am Harmersbach right across the road from where my mother was watching the whole damned spectacle on a fourteen-inch portable TV with a gaggle of doting German royalists. I was Thinking Dark Thoughts and singing the Internationale under my breath.

For the past five days we’ve been in Montpellier for the Comedie du Livres, returning home yesterday evening to find the entire country covered in bunting and patrolled by guardsmen.

In a final last ditch attempt to pretend this wasn’t happening, I unpacked my holdall and went and hid in the Hastings Odeon, just in time to catch the 8pm showing of Prometheus. Only that was bad, too.

I’ll be kind-of writing more about that (Prometheus that is, not the jubilee) for my Starburst column next month. Meanwhile, Montpellier was glorious. Chris had been invited to participate in a festival strand featuring UK authors. The festival organizers made thoughtful and imaginative choices, and we felt privileged to be in company with so many fine writers including Jon McGregor, Sarah Hall, Ian McDonald, Anne Fine, Melvyn Burgess and Tim Parks. The Scottish contingent was particularly strong. On the Saturday morning I attended a panel on the new writing coming out of Glasgow – Alasdair Gray, James Kelman, Louise Walsh, Alan Warner all in one room! The debate was forthright, passionate and wholly committed as only a discussion among Scottish writers can be, and I was particularly thrilled to meet Alan Warner, a writer I admire immensely and whose novel Morvern Callar continues to be a key inspiration. The experience left me fired up and itching to get back to my desk, a sure sign that the journey was worthwhile.

Chris’s panels and interviews went very well indeed, the passion for books and interest in writers among festival-goers a real joy to see.

Montpellier is a gem. Even more so because it has trams. We had a good part of the day free on Friday, so we took the tram out to the terminus and then got on a bus that transported us right to the edge of the Mediterranean at Palavas, a kind of Ballard-land of white apartment blocks and glass-fronted bars. It was weird but weirdly invigorating just to stand there and gaze at it all. I burned my bare feet on the sand and wished I’d thought to bring my swimming costume. My childhood memories are repeatedly underscored by such potent, recurrent images of the south of France, and being back there, however briefly, always feels vaguely extraordinary, a species of time travel.

It was all right on the night

Last night we attended the presentation of the 26th Arthur C. Clarke Award, which went to Jane Rogers for her novel The Testament of Jessie Lamb.

It was an enjoyable evening indeed. The happy sense of occasion that always accompanies the gathering of the genre clans, coupled with the anticipatory buzz attendant upon the impending resolution of a, shall we say, somewhat vexed question made it special. For me personally, what in my opinion was undeniably the ‘right result’ made it doubly so.

Jessie Lamb – like all the shortlisted titles – has divided opinion. While many readers admired the novel as much as I did, others felt the core premise insufficiently advanced. Some felt that Rogers’s choice of a first person narrator restricted the novel’s ability to tell its own story, while others simply were not convinced by Jessie’s voice. For me, whilst I’m willing to concede that in SFnal terms The Testament of Jessie Lamb did not break much new ground – that the book felt, in fact, a little old fashioned – given the emotional power of this novel, the technical excellence of its execution and most especially when measured against the other shortlistees it was not only a worthy winner, but a winner that sends out all the right signals, both to the world of SF and to the wider literary establishment. The Testament of Jessie Lamb is a book I felt a strong enthusiasm for while I was actually reading it and – more importantly – that I love and admire enough to keep in my personal canon, to feel certain of wanting to read it again in the future.  This desire to reread is, for me, the true test of good writing.

For me, it was Rogers’s superb realisation of Jessie’s voice that impressed me most, the sense of passionate despair and helplessness experienced by so many young people at the state of the world they are born into, but that in Jessie’s case is heightened by the extremity and urgency of the situation. Jessie is both overwhelmed and empowered by her need to do something, to differentiate herself from those – and in particular from those adults – who are content to remain as onlookers, as bystanders, and it is in the portrayal of this dichotomy between being overwhelmed and empowered that the novel’s power lies.

I think it’s a beautiful book. Not just an imaginative use of science fictional ideas, but in its expert craftsmanship, its use of language and its creative expression a true work of literature.

It’s great to know that Jessie Lamb will soon be getting the wider distribution and exposure it deserves through a mass-market edition from Canongate. What is even better though is that Jane Rogers has already stated her intention to write more science fiction. When I spoke to her just after the award was announced, my first and eager question was: had the Clarke win inspired her to continue working in the area of speculative fiction? Her reply was an unqualified yes. ‘I see this as a great opportunity,’ she said. ‘I’m thrilled to have won the award and delighted by the reception the novel has been enjoying within the genre. The thing with science fiction is that it enables writers to explore the really big ideas. I’ve always been excited by that, and I want to do more.’

If the Clarke Award has achieved anything this year it is this. SF absolutely needs and absolutely should welcome writers like Jane Rogers. To see her work recognised by an award of this calibre, and to see Jane Rogers recognising the worth and significance of that award for her writing life – that’s what the Clarke should be about. While it is still true and shall remain true that the 2012 Clarke would have been all the more exciting and significant had the winner properly emerged from a shortlist that properly complemented her talent, this was still a great call and I salute the judges for it.

The other significant achievement of this year’s Clarke has of course been the level and quality of debate surrounding it. SF is not only a literature of ideas, it is a literature of personal passions, and to see those passions expressed with such forthrightness and eloquence can only be to the advantage and advancement of the genre. We have all benefited from this year’s Clarke conversation, most of all because it has shown that SF matters, and that it matters as literature. I am already looking forward to Clarke 2013, and if that makes me a greedy person then so be it.

I want to thank those excellent bloggers and critics who over these past few weeks have so generously and articulately offered their thoughts and insights into the shortlist, in particular Dan Hartland, Niall Harrison, Adam Roberts, David Hebblethwaite and the truly heroic Maureen Kincaid Speller – I have so totally loved every moment of their commentaries. Thanks also to Tom Hunter, whose marvellous stewardship of the award is to continue – he’s fantastic.

I’d like to end this post though with a short extract from The Testament of Jessie Lamb, one of my favourite passages from the novel and one, I hope, that highlights its poignancy and beauty. Congratulations to Jane Rogers, winner of the Arthur C. Clarke Award 2012.

 

‘I bet loads of it belonged to dead people,’ said Mary. I thought about the women who’d died from MDS and wondered if their husbands had given away their clothes. Imagine going through your wife’s wardrobe and just putting it all in binliners – the T-shirts, the jeans that you’d seen her wearing every day……. I wondered who had worn my dress, I wondered if she went dancing in it. I had the strangest feeling, almost as if the dress was a body. I’d put the dress on and in doing that I’d put on another body. A light, twirling, dancing body. And after me, someone else could wear the dress. And someone else. And they would all have a sense of that, the light, twirling, dancing body. But of course they would be themselves as well. I was thinking, if that much can be passed on just in a dress, how much of every living person lives on after they die? Feeds into everyone else, in different ways, through what they’ve said and done and made. All these dead clothes could come back to life as soon as we put them on. I thought, death is really no big deal. I could die and I wouldn’t mind at all.

(pp 90-92, The Testament of Jessie Lamb, Jane Rogers, Sandstone Press 2011.)

Thought for the day

Irvine Welsh in today’s Guardian describes his approach to plot as ‘just a big mess’:

“I come up with a blurb at the beginning, but the book’ll always be completely different by the time it’s finished. They say: ‘Where’s the book you were going to write?’ And I say, forget about it, it doesn’t exist.”

I am so getting that right now……

Newer posts »

© 2025 The Spider's House

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑